This is very interesting and I think hits at a true difference in readership preference (even if its not strictly gendered). There is another article out now about narrative distance, and how many of the classics had a more distant lens where later books have a closer lens. Most of the "girl" fantasies you mentioned all have extremely close narrative distance where the "boy" fantasies don't. My gut tells me "boy" fantasy has an appeal to a more male coded readerahip bc it mimics videogames. Like appeals to like. That would have interesting applications in how we can keep young men reading books. But a true study would be fascinating to see.
Sorey, a lot of meandering here. This was an excellent artilce.
this really aligns with my theory that I could convince Susanna Clarke to transition
one way to find out
This is very interesting and I think hits at a true difference in readership preference (even if its not strictly gendered). There is another article out now about narrative distance, and how many of the classics had a more distant lens where later books have a closer lens. Most of the "girl" fantasies you mentioned all have extremely close narrative distance where the "boy" fantasies don't. My gut tells me "boy" fantasy has an appeal to a more male coded readerahip bc it mimics videogames. Like appeals to like. That would have interesting applications in how we can keep young men reading books. But a true study would be fascinating to see.
Sorey, a lot of meandering here. This was an excellent artilce.
Thanks! (And I'd be interested to see the narrative distance article! That sounds like a really interesting additional lens...)
Heh, it's kind of like shoujo manga and shonen manga.
YES!!!!!